UK court rules against teen battling parents over move to Ghana

A 14-year-old boy has lost a legal battle against his parents after the UK High Court ruled they acted lawfully in sending him to a boarding school in Ghana. The teenager, who had lived in the UK since birth, argued that his parents tricked him into the move under the pretence of visiting a sick relative.

The boy, described as articulate and passionate about football and cooking, claimed he was “living in hell” in Ghana and pleaded to return to England. He reached out to the British High Commission in Accra and the charity Children and Family Across Borders, which helped him secure legal representation. However, the court found his parents’ decision was motivated by concern for his safety, fearing he was being drawn into criminal activity in London.

Parental concerns and safety fears

The boy’s parents told the court they acted out of “deep, obvious, and unconditional love” after observing worrying changes in their son. His father said they feared he would become “yet another black teenager stabbed to death in the streets of London.”

The court heard that his school had also raised concerns about his behaviour, noting suspicions of criminal involvement and his possession of expensive clothes and multiple mobile phones. Legal representatives for his father argued that the boy met 11 indicators from a checklist by the NSPCC for gang involvement or criminal exploitation, including unexplained absences from school, new possessions, and carrying weapons.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite these claims, the boy denied any gang involvement, stating he had never been in a gang, did not associate with gang members, and did not carry a knife. He admitted his “behaviour wasn’t the best” but said he believed his parents sent him away as a consequence rather than for protection.

Difficulties adjusting in Ghana

The teenager said he struggled to settle in his new school in Ghana, faced mockery from peers, and got into fights. He also found the curriculum less challenging than in the UK, claiming his education had suffered and that he felt “dumber than people I used to be smarter than.”

His father, who recently visited him, said they had explored a different boarding school, which they both found impressive. However, the boy’s legal representatives pointed out that no place was available until September, and the teenager had not indicated he wanted to attend.

Court ruling and legal implications

High Court judge Mr Justice Hayden ruled in favour of the parents, concluding that returning the boy to the UK posed a greater risk to his well-being. He described the case as “sobering and rather depressing” but maintained that the parents acted within their rights.

Following the ruling, the boy’s solicitor, James Netto of the International Family Law Group, said the teenager was “incredibly disappointed” and is considering his next steps. Netto also noted an increase in similar cases where teenagers seek legal protection after being sent abroad by their parents due to concerns about their behaviour.

In a statement after the ruling, the boy’s parents said: “This has been a really difficult time for us all. Our priority has always been protecting our son, and our focus now is on moving forward as a family.”